Current:Home > StocksArkansas abortion measure’s signatures from volunteers alone would fall short, filing shows -InvestTomorrow
Arkansas abortion measure’s signatures from volunteers alone would fall short, filing shows
View
Date:2025-04-12 12:06:24
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — The signatures collected by volunteers for an Arkansas abortion-rights measure would fall short of the number needed to qualify for the ballot if those are the only ones counted, according to an initial tally from election officials filed Thursday with the state Supreme Court.
The filing from the secretary of state’s office comes after the court ordered officials to begin counting signatures submitted, but only those collected by volunteers. Arkansans for Limited Government, which used volunteer and paid canvassers, has sued the state for rejecting its petitions.
The Arkansas secretary of state’s office said it determined that 87,675 of the signatures were collected by volunteers, which alone would fall short of the 90,704 signature threshold from registered voters required to qualify. The filing said it could not determine whether another 912 signatures were collected by paid canvassers or volunteers.
Organizers submitted more than 101,000 signatures on the July 5 deadline in favor of the proposal to scale back Arkansas’ abortion ban. But state officials rejected the petitions days later, claiming the group did not properly submit documents regarding paid canvassers it used.
Justices are considering whether to allow the abortion-rights campaign’s lawsuit challenging the rejection to go forward. It’s not clear the next step for justices, who have not ruled on the state’s request to dismiss the abortion campaign’s lawsuit.
Arkansans for Limited Government said the initial tally shows that if the total number of signatures from paid and canvassers is counted, the state can move forward with checking the validity of the signatures.
“Our optimism remains alive but cautious as we wait for the Arkansas Supreme Court to issue further guidance,” the group said.
Attorney General Tim Griffin, however, asserted the count showed the process can’t move forward for the proposal.
“The Secretary of State fulfilled the order of the Arkansas Supreme Court, did so ahead of schedule, and confirmed that the abortion advocates did not turn in enough qualifying signatures to meet the statutory threshold for a cure period,” Griffin said.
The proposed amendment, if approved, wouldn’t make abortion a constitutional right but is seen as a test of support for abortion rights in a predominantly Republican state. Arkansas currently bans abortion at any time during a pregnancy, unless the woman’s life is endangered due to a medical emergency.
The proposed amendment would prohibit laws banning abortion in the first 20 weeks of gestation and allow the procedure later on in cases of rape, incest, threats to the woman’s health or life, or if the fetus would be unlikely to survive birth.
Arkansans for Limited Government and election officials disagreed over whether the petitions complied with a 2013 state law requiring campaigns to submit statements identifying each paid canvasser by name and confirming that rules for gathering signatures were explained to them.
Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision removing the nationwide right to abortion, there has been a push to have voters decide the matter state by state.
veryGood! (95853)
Related
- As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
Ranking
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- Trump's 'stop
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
Recommendation
Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
Intellectuals vs. The Internet
What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast