Current:Home > MyTrump sues Bob Woodward for releasing audio of their interviews without permission -InvestTomorrow
Trump sues Bob Woodward for releasing audio of their interviews without permission
View
Date:2025-04-24 19:16:22
Former President Donald Trump has made good on his threat to sue Bob Woodward over the Washington Post journalist's latest book, accusing him of releasing audio recordings of their interviews without his consent and seeking nearly $50 million in damages.
The lawsuit, filed Monday in the Northern District of Florida, also names publisher Simon & Schuster and its parent company, Paramount Global, as defendants. It accuses Woodward of the "systematic usurpation, manipulation, and exploitation of audio" in violation of Trump's contractual rights and copyright interests.
At issue is the audiobook The Trump Tapes: Bob Woodward's Twenty Interviews with President Donald Trump, which was published in October 2022 and consists of recordings of more than a dozen interviews the two had done during Trump's final year in office.
Those interviews — conducted with Trump's full cooperation at the White House and Mar-a-Lago between December 2019 and August 2020 — formed the basis of Woodward's 2020 book Rage. It made headlines for revealing, among other things, the extent to which Trump had downplayed the COVID-19 pandemic.
Trump alleges that when Rage failed to reach the same level of commercial success as Fear, Woodward's 2018 book focused on the Trump White House, the journalist and publisher "conspired to, and did, collate and cobble together more than eight hours of 'raw' interviews" and released them in audiobook format "without President Trump's permission."
The lawsuit also accuses those involved of unlawfully manipulating audio by selectively omitting portions of Trump's answers. Trump described it as "an open and blatant attempt to make me look as bad as possible," in a series of Truth Social posts on Monday.
"Paramount, SSI, and Woodward deviated from industry standard practices, did not obtain the requisite releases, misappropriated President Trump's copyright interests, manipulated the recordings to benefit Woodward's desired narrative while peddling the story that the recordings are 'raw,' and deprived President Trump of the opportunity to publish or not to publish his words, read in his voice," the complaint reads.
The book has since been published in other forms, including a paperback and electronic book. Based on the price of each audiobook, the lawsuit is seeking more than $49 million, not including punitive damages and attorney's fees.
Woodward and Simon & Schuster have responded with a joint statement calling the lawsuit "without merit" and promising to "aggressively defend against it."
"All these interviews were on the record and recorded with President Trump's knowledge and agreement," reads the statement provided to NPR. "Moreover, it is in the public interest to have this historical record in Trump's own words. We are confident that the facts and the law are in our favor."
The lawsuit is far from a surprise — it's Trump's M.O.
Trump said at the time of the audiobook's release that he would sue Woodward — whom he called "very sleazy" — to be compensated for the sale of tapes that he claims belong to him.
The lawsuit is Trump's latest attempt to discredit journalists and others who have been critical of him.
"I am continuing my fight against this corrupt, dishonest, and deranged Fake News Media by filing this lawsuit against a man whose image is far different from the fact, Bob Woodward, his publisher Simon & Schuster, and their parent company, Paramount Global," Trump, who has actively peddled election disinformation, wrote on Truth Social, adding that "I will always champion TRUTH and battle against the evil forces of disinformation and Fake News!"
In October 2022 Trump sued CNN for alleged defamation, seeking $475 million in damages. The following month he sued New York Attorney General Letitia James for intimidation.
That was one of two lawsuits Trump withdrew in recent weeks, after a Florida judge fined him and his attorney nearly $1 million for bringing what he deemed a "completely frivolous" lawsuit against Hillary Clinton and other political rivals.
U.S. District Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks accused Trump of a "pattern of abuse of the courts" for filing frivolous lawsuits for political purposes, which he said "undermines the rule of law" and "amounts to obstruction of justice," as the Associated Press reported earlier this month.
Trump and his business have also been on the receiving end of numerous lawsuits.
Among them: A federal judge ruled earlier this month that writer E. Jean Carroll can proceed with rape and defamation claims against Trump and a New York court ordered two companies owned by the former president to pay $1.61 million in fines and penalties for tax fraud.
Meanwhile, a grand jury in Manhattan is hearing evidence this week about whether Trump committed crimes over hush money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels in 2016.
veryGood! (3)
Related
- Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
- 3 of 5 former Memphis officers charged in Tyre Nichols’ death want separate trials
- No. 1 pick Bryce Young shows some improvement in quiet second NFL preseason game
- Ohio woman says she found pennies lodged inside her McDonald's chicken McNuggets
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- Another Disney princess, another online outrage. This time it's about 'Snow White'
- New York judge blocks retail marijuana licensing, a major blow to state’s fledgling program
- Price of college football realignment: Losing seasons, stiffer competition
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- Daughter says NYC shark bite victim has had 5 surgeries and has been left with permanent disability
Ranking
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Uber, Lyft say they'll leave Minneapolis if rideshare minimum wage ordinance passes. Here's why.
- Ravens sign veteran edge rusher Jadeveon Clowney
- Charlize Theron Has the Best Response to Rumors She’s Gotten Plastic Surgery
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Judge won’t delay Trump’s defamation claims trial, calling the ex-president’s appeal frivolous
- How And Just Like That Gave Stanford Blatch a Final Ending After Willie Garson's Death
- Metals, government debt, and a climate lawsuit
Recommendation
Selena Gomez engaged to Benny Blanco after 1 year together: 'Forever begins now'
Hilary rapidly grows to Category 4 hurricane off Mexico and could bring heavy rain to US Southwest
Corporate DEI initiatives are facing cutbacks and legal attacks
Raise a Glass to Ariana Madix's New Single AF Business Venture After Personal Devastation
Arkansas State Police probe death of woman found after officer
DonorsChoose sees banner donation year with help from Gates Foundation and millions of small gifts
Khadijah Haqq and Bobby McCray Break Up After 13 Years of Marriage
Trump's D.C. trial should not take place until April 2026, his lawyers argue